Reponse to Classmates Blog

In his blog “Drinking Age 21 or 25” he talks about the drinking age and how it should be raised to 25. Drinking has so many side effects on individuals. Alcohol consumption is linked to many serious crimes and it causes deaths of thousands of people each year. Alcohol damages brain cells if consumed excessively, judgment and the ability to think straight can also become extremely impaired, and it can also cause death. Now, the question is how can we prevent those? I agree with my class mate to some extent that courses about alcohol consumption should be provided and I believe that they should be like any other course we need to take in order to graduate.

On the other hand putting more restrictions causes curiosity among youngsters and they want to try it out, even though they are minors. Like drinking age 25 instead of 21, it might cause even more serious problems involving alcohol consumption. Many researcher show that in many countries like Germany where the drinking age is 16 have less serious cases involving alcohol consumption. Alcohol can be consumed anywhere, anytime and it is as cheap water.

So it is not just the drinking age, which needs to be changed in order to avoid problems, there are many other aspects that need to be considered as well and come up with a new system with new laws that meet the multicultural American society.

Do SAT and ACT measure the potential of students and is it enough?

      Getting a higher education degree is becoming more and more important as time is passing and students are faced with many challenges. Many people ( students and teachers) question the admission criteria set by the Universities. Standardized tests like the SAT and ACT is one of the major components set by most universities to select the students. The question is do these tests measure the potential of a student to do better in their studies, and is it enough to judge the intelligence of a student? These tests claim to measure students' reading, math, and the writing skills and the knowledge that they acquire during their prior education. The SAT also measures how well students can apply their knowledge, which is believes to be a good predictor of a student’s success in college.

      Most prestigious schools, like Duke and Harvard use the SAT and ACT  as one of the primary components when looking at the students admission profiles. A student need to score around 90^th percentile or higher to get accepted ( which is about 2100 out of 2400 for SAT)   Is it fair to those students who have straight A’s throughout their high school, have been involved in many extracurricular activities, or have been selected as  members of the National Honor Society to be rejected? Because they have low SAT or ACT scores, they have not been accepted in the schools with a good reputation.

     Often the general public believes that a high school can be judged on its students’ SAT and ACT scores; high scores equal good school. This is not always the case,  as psychometrician Daniel Koretz says that scores on a standardized test “usually do not provide a direct and complete measure of educational achievement.” Do these tests motivate to do better and study harder?, well it turns out that’s not the case. A study conducted by Boston College's Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, finds out that high standard scores might give a wrong incentive to teachers and leads them to focus on encouraging memorizing among students instead of learning and reasoning.

An Article about Our Future

Every student going to college,  taking out student loans to cover his/her educational expenses wonders at some point in his/her educational career whether after getting  all this education is he/she going to get the higher paying job or not. The notion is that if you go to college get a higher degree you will get a good paying job. In this article from The Texas Tribune, Tom Pauken chairman of the Texas Workforce Commission finds out that not the case. He argues that in upcoming years the high paying jobs would be in the fast food industry like Mc Donald’s and most of these jobs do not even require college degree. He also suggests that it would be beneficial if students are offered some type of training programs that would meet the conditions for the job industry for upcoming years. So the question arises why do we even need to go to college and get a higher education degree? Texas Higher Education Commissioner Raymund Paredes argues that we need to reform all aspects (fields) of the education system and college degrees are still beneficial as it turns out that people with college degree usually have low unemployment rates and they use that knowledge one way or another, so it is beneficial to get the college degree. I chose this article because it relates to students and our futures. We are going to college and making a substantial monetary investment into our future by paying tuition with hopes of finding a better, higher paying job once we leave school. But, what if we have a college degree and still have to work at the same level with those who did not go to college and who did not work as hard as us, then what’s the point of going to college and aquiring all the debt?